Tag name:liftoff!

1969 SARSA Summary

First published 31st October 2017 (Last Modified 21st December 2021)
Program Units Safety Factor
1. Orbital Satellite 0 96%
2. Interplanetary Satellite 0 92%1
3. Lunar Probe 0 86%2
A. One Stage Rocket 0 85%
C. Three Stage Rocket 1 98%
EVA Suits n/a 98%
d. Two Person Lunar Module 2 87%
f. Three Person Capsule 1 68%3
Photo-Reconnaissance n/a 80%

Astronauts

Name Completed Flights
Wei Engel 1
Fiona Ngubane 0
Ryan Cilliers 0
Herman Hanekom 0
Yolandi Schutte 0
Victor Nzimande 0
Gugulethu Turner 0

One time only, may plan a manned mission to take animal passengers instead of human, thus avoiding most of the risk of a catastrophic accident. Success counts as a subsequent mission for budget purposes.

2 Launch Facilities at undisclosed locations

0 Launches planned for 1970


Last updated: December 21, 2021 at 19:38 pm

Footnotes

  1. May be researched to 95%, absolute maximum of 98%
  2. May be researched to 90%, absolute maximum of 93%
  3. May be researched to 92%

1969 GOSsiP Summary

First published 31st October 2017 (Last Modified 21st December 2021)
Program Units Safety Factor
2. Interplanetary Satellite 1 69%
3. Lunar Probe 0 83%1
B. Two Stage Rocket 3 95%
D. Liquid Fuel Strap-Ons 3 89%
EVA Suits n/a 81%
c. Three Person Capsule 3 92%
g. Two Person Lunar Lander 1 74%

Astronauts

Name Completed Flights
Maja Hansen 1
Curtis Adamson 1
Kristian Swenhaugen 1

One time only, may plan a manned mission to take animal passengers instead of human, thus avoiding most of the risk of a catastrophic accident. Success counts as a subsequent mission for budget purposes.

1 Launch Facility at Julianehåb.

3 Launches planned for 1970


Last updated: December 21, 2021 at 19:38 pm

Footnotes

  1. Loses 10% on its next mission (only) unless $10,000,000 is paid

1969 ASA Summary

First published 31st October 2017 (Last Modified 21st December 2021)
Program Units Safety Factor
1. Orbital Satellite 0 96%
2. Interplanetary Satellite 0 91%
3. Lunar Probe 0 85%
B. Two Stage Rocket 2 94%
D. Mega Stage Rocket 3 98%
EVA Suits n/a 98%
c. Three Person Capsule 2 40%
h. Four Person Capsule/Module 4 83%
Photo Reconnaissance n/a 70%

Astronauts

Name Completed Flights
Professor Matthew "Matt" Matic 0
Croc Hogan 1
Dingo Dan 1
Bob Hoskins 1
Larry Hoskins 1

One time only, a launch can be delayed to gain a 10% safety factor (for that launch) to the rocket used in the launch.

3 Launch Facilities at Woomera

First module failure will be ignored.

0 Launches planned for 1970


Last updated: December 21, 2021 at 19:38 pm

1969

First published 31st October 2017 (Last Modified 21st December 2021)

Is this just a Training Exercise or ASA's sound stage?

Has ASA been faking its successes?

Questions have been raised about the reported successes of the Australian Space Agency following recent events in the agency. While the agency has admitted that all of its three launches failed, it claims that mission that used the four person capsule didn't kill anybody and has even had the crew attend a post mission press meeting on the 26th of December.

The first Australian mission of 1969, a manned lunar pass using the agencies' three person capsule has been admitted by the agency to have a catastrophic failure when the capsule carrying Lieutenant 90, Zak Zodiac and Mel Bourne exploded as it attempted to leave Earth Orbit to commence its journey to the moon. It is conjectured that the fuel pipes of the main rocket engine must have suffered a breakage quite near the fuel tanks. In any event when the command to fire the main engine was sent to the craft, it burst into flames (fuelled by the capsules reserves of oxygen) and the cabin quickly became unsurvivable.

It was ASA's second mission that has caused all the controversy though. This mission, a manned lunar orbit using the four person capsule/module (and hence unaffected by the failure of the three person capsule) was going smoothly until the second orbit around the moon. The crew failed to respond to a scheduled communications call between mission control and the capsule and all attempts by ground control to re-establish communications failed and the atmosphere at Woomera became even grimmer as the prospect of the loss of the third manned mission in a row loomed. However the crew of the capsule (Croc Hogan, Dingo Dan, Bob Hoskins and Larry Hoskins) were able to continue the mission and there was jubilation when the australian radar picked up the capsule back in earth orbit and as the craft safely re-entered the earth's atmosphere and the crew of the capsule recovered from the Pacific ocean1.

Doubts about the mission have been spread by the other agencies who point to the lack of direction at the top of ASA during the last year mean that the odds that the mission will be discovered to be a massive conspiracy and cover-up by Harold's Bar as a publicity stunt to drive up sales of the amber liquid have been rated as low as 8 to 1 in the betting shops of Sydney2.

ASA's third launch of the year was a lunar probe lander. This crashes into the Montes Alpes area surrounding the Plato crater after the craft was unable to locate a safe landing site.

Spacewalk by GOSsiP's Maja Hansen

Maja Hansen has become only the second person to float freely in space following the successful Manned Orbital and Spacewalk mission launched by GOSsiP this year. This success continues a trend for GOSsiP making them back into challengers for the space race to the moon (and back of course!).

SHADO has men in orbit too!

SHADO appears to have finally decided that not everything can be done by robots and has launched a successful manned orbital mission. Walter Clark and Judith Harris now become experienced astronauts! SHADO is not finished with its robot explorers however as its mission launched during 1967 returned lots of useful data from Mars.

SARSA loses Lunar Probe

SARSA sent a lunar probe to attempt a landing on the lunar surface but the probe has steadfastly refused to head in the direction of the moon and is stuck in earth orbit after the rocket motor on the probe failed to fire to take the probe out of earth orbit.

Concern at lack of docking

Hypothetical view of a docking manoeuvre

A review of the agencies' strategies suggests that many of them may be overlooking the importance of docking during most of the mission profiles that will take a person to the moon and back safely. With the exception of ASA's four person combined capsule/module, the trip to the moon and back requires two docking manoeuvres, one in earth orbit where the capsule is docked with the module so that it can carry it to the moon (the module does not need to be launched by the same rocket as the capsule but in every case the module is not launched pre-docked with the capsule - that said if a docking module is required3 it can be either separately launched (which would require an additional docking manoeuvre to collect) or launched pre-docked with the lunar landing module.

A second docking manoeuvre is required once the lunar landing module leaves the lunar surface and to allow the brave astronaut to return to the capsule for the return to Earth.

As yet no space agency has successfully performed a docking manoeuvre. Simulations suggest that it's more complicated that just pointing your space vessel at the target and firing your rockets (by doing so, you go faster and hence into a higher orbit. As the higher orbit has a longer orbital period you end up just getting further away from your target!)

Another engineering advance for SHADO

SHADO's engineering division has again been able to significantly cut costs for the rest of the organisation and have offered, for the next year only, to half the charges made to acquire new hardware made to the rest of the SHADO organisation. Officials have refused to allow the division to be audited to see if this price cut (and that available for 1963) could be made permanent! The engineering division has also denied that this is an attempt to get their hands on the spare $500,000 that has been sitting SHADO's balance sheet for many years4.

More animals at SARSA?

SARSA is again considering the use of the animals to test some of its equipment in future missions. While it isn't clear which animals are under consideration (some wags have suggested that maybe certain government ministers who have interfered with SARSA's plans are the potential candidates for the missions)5.

Smaug Inc.'s Oscar Hudson killed

As a result of car crash as he was heading to New York City's JFK airport to catch a flight on the journey to Smaug Inc.'s launch site, Smaug Inc. is mourning the loss of Oscar Hudson, one of the agency's astronaut crew. No foul play is suspected in the crash despite the likelihood that his death will have an impact on the launches planned by Smaug Inc for next year6.

South African spies still at work?

GOSsiP has admitted that there is a minor problem with its lunar probe that means that its safety factor will be reduced by 10% on its next mission. The agency is apparently considering spending $10,000,000 to rectify the fault, but others in the agency point out that the error could be solved fairly simply if only they could determine the exact flaw and its effect by just launching the probe on its way. SARSA has denied that its agents (if it had any) had anything to do with the problems with the probe7.

Hold up at ASA

The Australian ground control has announced a new concept for the agency's management of launches. It now has the ability to announce a hold on one of its launches. This will increase the safety factor of the rocket used on that launch by 10%8. The hold will delay the launch by several days however and it is expected that the engineers will quickly learn how to take advantage of the possibility9.

Launch Calendar

The provisional calendar for launches planned in 1970 (assuming none of the missions are rushed or scrubbed) is as follows:

5th Dec
SHADO
11th Dec
Smaug Inc.
14th Dec
Smaug Inc.
17th Dec
Smaug Inc.
26rd Dec
GOSsiP
29th Dec
GOSsiP10
31th Dec
GOSsiP11

Last updated: December 21, 2021 at 19:38 pm
1st Nov 2017
Make text into a footnote as intended
14th Nov 2017
Fix wording of footnote 9 and fix typo

Footnotes

  1. Although the crew returned safely, this mission does not count as a success and hence does not earn any mission budget increases but instead causes a $10,000,000 budget cut (but does not impact the safety factor of the four person capsule/module).
  2. Note: no orders received from ASA for this turn, but there was sufficient equipment in stock to proceed with the launches. I did apply research to the four person capsule/module to keep the game competitive - but did not plan any future launches.
  3. A docking module is required to dock between a two-person capsule and a one-person lunar landing module.
  4. All hardware purchased by SHADO in 1970 will be half price.
  5. Yes SARSA can again, one time only, plan a manned mission to take animal passengers instead of human. The mission provides the usual 1% improvement to safety factor to any equipment used without (most of) the risk of a catastrophic failure. A successful mission will improve the agency's budget as if the mission was a subsequent mission. A failed mission will decrease the budget by the standard $3,000,000 (assuming the rocket didn't kill people on the launch pad).
  6. If Oscar Hudson was planned to take part in any of the three launches planned by Smaug Inc. for 1970, that mission will be scrubbed.
  7. Unless GOSsiP pays $10,000,000 its next lunar probe that it launches will be at a 10% penalty. This money will not go to SARSA, but is simply spent.
  8. for that launch only
  9. One time only, ASA can delay a launch of one of its missions and gain a 10% safety factor on the launch.
  10. Will be automatically scrubbed if GOSsiP doesn't buy a second launch facility.
  11. Will be automatically scrubbed if GOSsiP doesn't buy a third launch facility.

1968 ASA Summary

First published 17th October 2017 (Last Modified 21st December 2021)
Program Units Safety Factor
1. Orbital Satellite 0 96%
2. Interplanetary Satellite 0 91%
3. Lunar Probe 0 85%
B. Two Stage Rocket 2 94%
D. Mega Stage Rocket 5 97%
EVA Suits n/a 98%
c. Three Person Capsule 3 92%
h. Four Person Capsule/Module 3 59%

Astronauts

Name Completed Flights
Professor Matthew "Matt" Matic 0
Lieutenant 90 0
Zak Zodiac 0
Mel Bourne 0
Croc Hogan 0
Dingo Dan 0
Bob Hoskins 0
Larry Hoskins 0

3 Launch Facilities at Woomera

First module failure will be ignored.

Next launch will have a +10% bonus to the safety factor of the rocket

3 Launches planned for 1969


Last updated: December 21, 2021 at 19:38 pm

1968 GOSsiP Summary

First published 17th October 2017 (Last Modified 21st December 2021)
Program Units Safety Factor
2. Interplanetary Satellite 1 69%
3. Lunar Probe 0 83%
B. Two Stage Rocket 1 94%
D. Liquid Fuel Strap-Ons 1 88%
EVA Suits n/a 60%
c. Three Person Capsule 1 91%
g. Two Person Lunar Lander 1 44%

Astronauts

Name Completed Flights
Maja Hansen 1
Curtis Adamson 1
Kristian Swenhaugen 1

One time only, may plan a manned mission to take animal passengers instead of human, thus avoiding most of the risk of a catastrophic accident. Success counts as a subsequent mission for budget purposes.

1 Launch Facility at Julianehåb.

1 Launch planned for 1969


Last updated: December 21, 2021 at 19:38 pm

1968 SARSA Summary

First published 17th October 2017 (Last Modified 21st December 2021)
Program Units Safety Factor
1. Orbital Satellite 0 96%
2. Interplanetary Satellite 0 92%1
3. Lunar Probe 1 86%2
A. One Stage Rocket 0 85%
C. Three Stage Rocket 2 98%3
EVA Suits n/a 98%
d. Two Person Lunar Module 2 87%
f. Three Person Capsule 1 43%4
Photo-Reconnaissance n/a 80%

Astronauts

Name Completed Flights
Wei Engel 1
Fiona Ngubane 0
Ryan Cilliers 0
Herman Hanekom 0
Yolandi Schutte 0
Victor Nzimande 0
Gugulethu Turner 0

2 Launch Facilities at undisclosed locations

1 Launch planned for 1969


Last updated: December 21, 2021 at 19:38 pm

Footnotes

  1. May be researched to 95%, absolute maximum of 98%
  2. May be researched to 90%, absolute maximum of 93%
  3. Next launch (only) at a 20% safety penalty
  4. May be researched to 92%

1968 SHADO Summary

First published 17th October 2017 (Last Modified 21st December 2021)
Program Units Safety Factor
1. Orbital Satellite 1 71%
2. Interplanetary Satellite 0 91%
3. Lunar Probe 0 85%
4. Docking Module 1 45%
A. One Stage Rocket 1 54%
B. Two Stage Rocket 0 94%
C. Three Stage Rocket 1 46%
F. Kicker 1 74%
EVA Suits n/a 45%
b. Two Person Capsule 1 85%

Astronauts

Name Completed Flights
Walter Clark 0
Judith Harris 0

One time only, may plan a manned mission to take animal passengers instead of human, thus avoiding most of the risk of a catastrophic accident. Success counts as a subsequent mission for budget purposes.

Astronauts may be recruited for only $1,000,000 each for the rest of the game

2 Launch Facilities at Honolulu and Lenur Island.

1 Launch planned for 1969


Last updated: December 21, 2021 at 19:38 pm

1968 Smaug Summary

First published 17th October 2017 (Last Modified 21st December 2021)
Program Units Safety Factor
1. Orbital Satellite 1 97%
2. Interplanetary Satellite 0 89%
3. Lunar Probe 1 86%
4. Docking Module 0 45%
B. Two Stage Rocket 3 97%
F. Kicker 1 85%
EVA Suits n/a 98%
b. Two person capsule 1 34%
c. Three person capsule 2 42%1
d. Two person Lander 1 23%
Photo-reconnaissance n/a 95%

Astronauts

Name Completed Flights
Hannah Kelley 0
Ian Carpenter 0
Johnny King 0
Nehemiah Juarez 0
Oscar Hudson 0
Patricia McNeely 0

3 Launch Facilities at an undisclosed locations.

0 Launches planned for 1968


Last updated: December 21, 2021 at 19:38 pm

Footnotes

  1. May be researched up to 91%

1968

First published 17th October 2017 (Last Modified 21st December 2021)

Launch from SHADO's base

No successes in 1968 either

Continuing the trend from 1968, there was no successful completed mission during 1968. The closest to success is another in the long line of planetary explorers launched by SHADO. This probe is on its way to Mars and will (assuming that it completes its work at Mars) continue onwards to Venus. SHADO's other mission was an attempt at a lunar probe landing. However, despite an almost perfect launch and its safe arrival in the vicinity of the moon, the probe did not respond when commanded to leave Lunar orbit and approach the lunar surface. It appears that a control valve has jammed on the probe preventing the main engine from firing. The probe continues to orbit the Moon.

SARSA's budget halved after failing to land a person on the moon by the end of 1968

Unsurprisingly the two planned missions from SARSA have been scrubbed. As a result of this failure to obey the orders of the South African Government, SARSA's budget was halved as a sign of disappointment.

Failure of GOSsiP's three man capsule prevents orbit

The attempt by GOSsiP's Maja Hansen, Curtis Adamson and Kristian Swenhaugen to join SARSA's Wei Engel as the only living astronauts to have circled the earth was thwarted by a malfunction in their three person capsule. When the craft attempted to enter Earth Orbit (having been lifted perfectly by a combination of a two stage rocket with additional liquid fuel strap booster rockets), the main engine of the capsule failed to ignite. The crew were able to use the manoeuvring jets to align their capsule for a re-entry and the crew was safely recovered from the South Atlantic1.

Australia challenges GOSsiP and SHADO with the biggest firework yet!

View of the Mega-stage rocket explosion

After the problems of last year ASA scrubbed two of the three missions it was planning for 1968. The remaining mission was to be a Lunar Probe launched on one of ASA's mega-stage rockets. While the rocket did leave the launch pad successfully, the rocket exploded 37 seconds after liftoff at a height of twenty miles. The sound of the explosion was heard in both Perth and Sydney on opposite of the Australian continent2.

GOSsiP takes a leaf (monkey)3 out of SARSA and SHADO's book

It seems that GOSsiP has been learning from the experiences of the other agencies and has announced that it too has the capability of performing an animal test instead of trying a manned flight. The reaction of the brave crew rescued from the South Atlantic have not been recorded4.

Saboteurs still work inside Smaug Inc.

Despite a major exercise to vet all of the scientists and crew working for Smaug Inc.'s space division, it seems that the South Africans5 have again been able to gain information about possible flaws in the Smaug Inc.'s three person capsule. It seems though, that as a repeat customer, South Africa is only requesting the transfer of $10,000,000 from Smaug Inc. to SARSA6.

Dr. Von Graun's world tour continues

It seems that Dr. Von Graun is attempting to be as even handed as possible (or possibly to collect as many pay checks as possible. He has now been seen at the South Pacific resorts commonly frequented by scientists, engineers and officials from SHADO7.

Problems hit SARSA's three stage rocket

A major problem with the piping and control valves in SARSA's three stage rocket mean that either the rocket's fuel systems will need a redesign or its next launch will be significantly more dangerous as the problems in the fuel system are ironed out8.

Australia's rockets rated as perfect

A review of the launch procedures of Australia's rockets have been rated as A+ by the Australian Engineering Safety Board. The board complemented the agency on the thoroughness of the pre launch checks and have asserted that they are confident that the next launch will go without a hitch9.

Launch Calendar

The provisional calendar for launches planned in 1969 (assuming none of the missions are rushed or scrubbed) is as follows:

5th Dec
SARSA
10th Dec
SHADO
14th Dec
GOSsiP
21th Dec
ASA
23rd Dec
ASA
27th Dec
ASA

Last updated: December 21, 2021 at 19:38 pm
31 October 2017
Launch Schedule is for 1969, Clarify footnote 4.

Footnotes

  1. So, a mission failure causing a budget cut of $3,000,000 but the crew survived and have gained a flight's worth of experience.
  2. The explosion did not damage the launch facility.
  3. Turns out there is a variety of monkey called a lead monkey!
  4. One time only GOSsiP may plan a manned mission to take animal passengers instead of human. The mission provides the usual 1% improvement to safety factor to any equipment used without (most of) the risk of a catastrophic failure. A successful mission will improve the agency's budget as if the mission was a subsequent mission. A failed mission will decrease the budget by the standard $3,000,000 (assuming the rocket didn't kill people on the launch pad).
  5. Who, of course, refuse to confirm or deny the existence of any secret service or any of its operations if it did exist...
  6. Smaug Inc. must either spend $10,000,000 on discovery and fixing of the fault, or suffer a 10% safety penalty to the capsule on its next mission (this penalty only applies to the next mission).
  7. +1 to every R&D die rolled by SHADO in 1969.
  8. SARSA must either pay $36,000,000 to correct the fault or its next launch (only) will be at a 20% penalty. SARSA's cash in hand is shown without this payment.
  9. ASA's next launch (only) will have a 10% bonus to its rocket safety (yes, assuming that ASA is not planning to a third rocket type, its next launch will not fail). Had ASA's launches not already been planned (due to the size of ASA's budget) to be last, the thoroughness of the launch checks would have bumped its launches to the end of the list.